Month: August 2004

  • Work, The Open Road, and more Work

    I’ve been rather silent lately.

    It will probably continue for some time.

    On the web site design and development front, I’ve currently got three regular projects and three side projects that need a lot of time and attention.

    As for the open road – it would be a pity to waste these summer days without getting out in the weather a bit. My motorcycle calls to me.

    And, of course, work. I’ve mentioned before that I bounce and barback at a nightclub in Minneapolis. Well, about half our staff works at the Renaissance Festival. Since I’m not working at fest this year, I’m being called in to cover a lot of shifts at the club.

    And if all that wasn’t enough, I’ve got to squeeze in band practice somewhere as well as possibly find a bit of time to spend with the girl.

    I know, I know, everybody’s busy. But I’m a wimp, so I’m on hiatus.

    Bummer that it is happening on at a time when I was starting to get a bit of a readership, but that’s life.

    If you’re bored, read the archives – it has been a hell of an evolution. Talk about flip-flopping …

    Oh yeah, if you watch presidential political ads read Fact Check for a regular analysis.

    And take your vitamins. Seeya around.

  • Someone told the truth

    Fact Check digs into another one.

    Synopsis: Kerry has used his involvement in the Senate Intelligence Committee as one of his qualifications for office. A Bush ad claims that he was absent for 76% of the public hearings. The Kerry camp accuses the Bush camp of fuzzy math and bad statistics. The facts of the matter? Based on all public information (which is all the ad implied), Bush is telling the truth.

    The Bush ad is being overly dramatic when they accuse Kerry of proposing to slash the intelligence budget by 6 billions dollars. The 6 billion was over 6 years and represented less than 4% of the overall spending.


    Surrender of authority

    Another concern about Kerry. He has continued to assert that his vote ceding congressional authority to wage war to the President was the right thing to do. His feeling was that the only problem was how Bush used that authority.

    If we need to go to war, congress should declare war. Congress should never surrender the right to wage war to the president.


    10.5 things

    Joshua Norton II, Emperor of The United States and Protector of Mexico gives us the “Ten and a half things you need to know if the United States is going to win the war on terror”:

    1) Terrorism is the product of religious fanaticism and therefore cannot be addressed as an attempt to implement a secular political or economic agenda. So terrorism has nothing to do with relentless long-term political or economic injustice.
    2) Anyone who says otherwise hates America.
    3) There’s a kind of Islam called Wahhabism, that teaches a fundamentalist interpretation of the Koran. This strain of Islam encourages, among other things, the murder of heretics, adulterers and gays.
    4) Wahhabism is more dangerous than anything ever in the history of the world. It’s a complete departure from the tenets of civilized society. Islam is particularly prone to this kind of thing, and Arabs are worse about it than pretty much anyone because they’re all crazy and they just kill each other all the time for no reason.
    5) The Inquisition was a long time ago. It doesn’t count. Shut up.
    6) Islamic fundamentalism has absolutely nothing in common with Christian fundamentalism. It’s totally different.
    7) Abortion clinic bombers, David Koresh and the Oklahoma City bombing don’t count. Shut up.
    8) It is possible to solve the problem of international terrorism directly by killing and jailing all the terrorists. So, like, every time you hear about some terrorist getting killed or arrested, that brings us one step closer to living in a world free of terrorism.
    8.5) This is totally different from the war on drugs. Shut up.
    9) The process of killing and jailing all the terrorists will not cause more terrorism because terrorism is the product of religious fanaticism and therefore cannot be addressed as an attempt to implement a secular political or economic agenda So terrorism has nothing to do with the slaughter of innocent civilians or the unilateral invasion of a sovereign nation by a country with an avowed interest in extracting the natural resources of that nation.
    10) Anyone who says otherwise hates America.

    *chuckle*

    I have some friends who might be considered followers of Wasabiism… mmm, sushi.

  • Featherly has created a well-written, well-reasoned column cautioning Democrats from dismissing George Bush as an idiot.


    Some political demonstrators have been targeted by the FBI in an effort aimed at keeping violent demonstrations away from NYC. Many activists feel that this aims at suppressing dissent and free speech. The FBI claims this is not the case, they are just trying to prevent domestic terrorism.

    The question I have is: If people left the fenced in, barbed-wired, “free-speech zones” at the Democratic convention and took their free speech where they wanted, were they violating the law? Would that make them the sort of terrorists the FBI was worried about?


    The Iraqi government has closed the office of al-Jazeera and Iraqi police in Najaf have not only told journalists to leave or face arrest, but may be shooting at them as well. The telegraph carries the story.

    One thing about the story that doesn’t make sense to me is that the police “tried to arrest the journalists”. I would think that if armed police wanted to arrest a bunch of people in a hotel, they’d probably succeed.

  • Off the wall Conspiracy Theory of the Day:

    I just made up a conspiracy theory based on various actual concerns:

    • November 2004 : Either Kerry or Bush wins the presidential elections.
    • January 2005 : During the inauguration, a nuclear blast hits Washington D.C. The remaining federal government declares martial law and shuts down nearly all civil liberties.
      • If Kerry/Edwards have won the election, both will be killed in the blast. Presidential succession will go to the Speaker of the House.
      • If Bush/Cheney have won, Bush will be killed and presidential succession will go to either Cheney, or if he was killed, to the Speaker of the House.
    • In either case, we would see the following:
      • Martial Law
      • Vigorous support of war efforts
      • A Republican controlled government
      • Nearly complete suppression of dissent via both social restraints, and application of the Sedition act when necessary

    For the record, I do not actually think this will happen, but it makes a good conspiracy theory, doesn’t it.


    More than just the Lizard?

    I was recently given a good reason (beyond the lizard strategy) to vote for Kerry. Judicial Nominations. Of course, there are “third party” (and Democratic) candidates who I’d still far rather see in office…

    Where, oh where, is Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) when we need it?


    Score 1

    In Venezuela, Chavez has won recall referendum by at least 15%. An interesting highlight is that voter turnout ended up being much higher than expected and they decided to keep the polls open 8 hours longer than they had originally scheduled. A nice nod to Democracy.


    Hell

    The Sudanese are in hell. I’ve already mentioned the refugee camps and genocide. To compound it all, they’re due for a swarm of locusts.


    More to ponder

    Interesting. I’ve never really had a problem with the 17th amendment which changed Senate seats from being appointed by the state legislature to being determined by a popular vote, similar to the House of Representatives.

    Alan Keyes (a conservative Republican challenging Barack Obama in the Illinois Senate race) has come out against the amendment. He does make an interesting point:

    The Republican Senate candidate in Illinois, asked about past comments on the election process, said Friday the constitutional amendment that provided for popular election of senators upset the balance between the people and the states.

    “The balance is utterly destroyed when the senators are directly elected because the state government as such no longer plays any role in the deliberations at the federal level,”

    Of course, it is being received as an anti-democracy stance, but I’m going to have to think about it a bit. As to the Illinois senate seat, I very much would like to see Obama continue in politics, and I have no desire to see Keyes in power.


    Be Sensitive

    Stolen from Atrios, an excerpt from Hugh Hewitt’s show:

    HH: Vice President Dick Cheney, welcome to the Hugh Hewitt Show.

    VP: It is good to be on here.

    HH: Today you brought attention to John Kerry’s plan to wage a more ‘sensitive’ war on terror. What do you think John Kerry meant when he said ‘sensitive,’ Mr. Vice President?

    VP: Well, I’m not sure what he meant (laughing). Ah, it strikes me the two words don’t really go together, sensitive and war. If you look at our history, I don’t think any of the wars we’ve won, were won by us being quote sensitive. I think of Abraham Lincoln and General Grant, they didn’t wage sensitive war. Neither did Roosevelt, neither did Eisenhower or MacArthur in World War II. A sensitive war will not destroy the evil men who killed 3,000 Americans, and who seek chemical, nuclear, and biological weapons to kill hundreds of thousands more….

    …[later]…

    HH: Will the Najaf offensive continue until that city is subdued even if that means a siege of the Imam Ali shrine?

    VP: Well, from the standpoint of the shrine, obviously it is a sensitive area, and we are very much aware of its sensitivity. On the other hand, a lot of people who worship there feel like Moqtada Sadr is the one who has defiled the shrine, if you will, and I would expect folks on the scene there, including U.S. commanders, will work very carefully with the Iraqis so that we minimize the extent to which the U.S. is involved in any operation that might involve the shrine itself.

    And there you go.


    Wha?

    They’re looking at giving the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products. Wow, it never even occurred to me that they didn’t have that authority.

    One thing I don’t understand about this article is that they are talking about a government buyout of tobacco farmers. What does that mean, and in the House version of the bill, why should taxpayers cover it? Both Kerry & Bush support some version of the buyout.

    As an aside: On the one hand, it is good to have someone who makes sure that foods and drugs meet minimal safety standards. On the other hand, the FDA is a centralized bureaucracy with little oversight and has all the issues one would expect in that case.


    Hm.

    Stolen from The Moderate Republican; A guy named Ted Halstead is supporting an idea he calls “Universal Capitalism” which would functionally give every newborn American financial assets at birth. Hm.

    He also supports mandatory health insurance coupled with subsidies for those who can’t afford it. Interesting approach.

  • Rage On

    The Onion gives us a worthy Op-Ed: “Where Are You Now, When We Need You Most, Rage Against The Machine?”

    The answer is that they combined with Soundgarden’s Chris Cornell to form Audioslave. In an odd bit of serendipity, Audioslave is part of The Axis Of Justice.


    Courage of Conviction

    Just a thought, but I think that if there is a draft, it should be limited only to people who had the chance to vote in the previous federal election.

    As an alternative, Strange Black Cat was mentioning a movement early last century that was attempting to change the constitution so that any call to war had to be a national referendum, and anyone who voted “yes” was required to serve if called upon.


    Yay! Trains!

    Governor Tim Pawlenty is taking heat from his party for supporting the Northstar commuter rail line.

    I lived in Boston for a short time, and found rail commuting to be a delight. I’ve seldom had the opportunity to take the train from city to city, but there is some part of me that loves the train. They are an efficient and pleasant way to move people and cargo between population centers, and something we really don’t take enough advantage of.

    Of course, I’d prefer they were run on regionally grown bio diesel…


    Got Sunscreen?

    The former Secretary of Defense, William Perry claims that there are even odds of a nuclear terror strike by 2010. The New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof offers an Op-Ed on the subject.


    Paranoia Strikes Deep?

    One of the Fraters Libertas proclaimed their disgust towards people drawing comparisons between America today and Nazi Germany.

    As I read their analysis of why this annoys them, a realization hit me. This is just another case of one side saying one thing and the other side hearing another. The waters of course get muddied by the rabid extremists of both sides.

    In the past, I’ve made some comparisons between contemporary America and pre-WWII Germany. I’ve also taken a look at the appeals and threats of fascism – a term that is so colored by the holocaust that it is hard to consider with any rationality.

    There are two mistakes being made. The first is in drawing the comparisons between the Third Reich as opposed to the culture that permitted the Third Reich to gain power. The second is, as rotten.com’s library put it, to dehumanize the crimes and actions of the Third Reich.

    When looking at the comparisons, the beliefs of racial superiority and anti-semitism are not points where parallels can be drawn. Where they can be drawn is in a strong sense of nationalism, a belief in their ideologies being superior, and a belief that in a strong centralized state. This, when combined with a sense of being attacked by the outside world and threatened by internal dissenters and disaffected, leads to a fascist state.

    When I look at our administration’s belief in the “Anglosphere” and support for the Project for the New American Century, I see a belief in a western ideology and a movement to push for worldwide adoption of Western culture and economics.

    When I see the State eclipsing the Individual, and strong anger being directed towards those who would dissent and thereby weaken the state, I see the building blocks of fascism.

    When I draw a comparison between American and Post WWI/Pre WWII Germany, I am looking at the suppression of dissent, the rise of the state over the individual, the belief that we are a nation with superior ideology that is being threatened by forces outside and within, and a drive towards spreading the concept of the Anglosphere across the globe.

    I do see us sliding towards a fascist state. Not one driven by the same fears and goals of Nazi Germany, but one with its own fears and goals. Not one that will instigate a horror on the level of the holocaust, but one that will be looked back upon with regret and disdain for its own crimes against free will and self determination. Many of these crimes have been committed years or decades ago, and our actions now can only mitigate or accentuate them.

    When it comes to our current conflicts, I do not believe that our enemies would attack us if we withdrew our influence and interference to our own borders. The Islamic militants would not come after us if we left the middle east.

    Unfortunately, it isn’t that easy.

    The state of the middle east is a result of over a century of heavy western influence, and a half a century of heavy American influence. A sudden withdrawal would collapse many power structures and cause chaos. That chaos would result in the rise of the most brutal and oppressive in the region and, to an extent, the suffering of the oppressed would be do to our actions.

    But back to the comparisons between America and Germany, it is a mistake to claim that our administration is being guided by a nefarious master plan aimed at another holocaust, but it is also a mistake not to realize that we are on a path that could easily lead towards fascism. A perfect fascist state might well be a great place to live, but it is much more likely to be degenerate and create horrors of its own.

    ###

  • Kerry’s not Bush

    The Onion has a great article summing up The Kerry Campaign. Although, I must take issue with one claim:

    “During his term in office, George Bush has relentlessly continued to be president”

    Actually, hasn’t George II taken an unprecedented number of days of vacation from being president?


    Yes, corporate master. No, corporate master. As you wish, corporate master.

    You can be banned admission to Olympic events this year if you have any food or drink from someone who didn’t sponsor the games.

    Actually, it isn’t quite that bad. You just can’t have the logos. If you remove the labels, you’ll be fine. No Pepsi bags or hats either. I’m not a bit Olympic fan, but it seems like the oligopolies keep creeping (or leaping) forward.


    Floridated

    This post on Greg Palast’s web site alleges that Choice Point (the company that botched the felony list in Florida for the 2000 election) has citizen/voter files for a number of other nations – Brazil, Nicaragua, Mexico, Argentina, and Venezuela.

    For those who don’t know, President Chavez of Venezuela is very unpopular with our current administration. Our government has been involved with numerous attempts to get Chavez out of office including supporting a coup a year or two ago and pushing the upcoming recall vote.

    If, during that recall vote, the lists of voter files which are also in the hands of our administration, fall into the hands of Chavez’s opposition, Palast alleges that Venezuela could end up being “Floridated”.


    More deceit

    If Kerry wants to win back the blue collar vote, they should stick to the facts rather than mislead. Fact Check digs further into Kerry camp claims that the Bush administration is responsible for manufacturing job losses. It is undeniable that we are loosing these jobs, but the Bush administration didn’t start it, and Kerry’s proposals won’t fix it. Read it here. Every time I feel I am being manipulated or misled, I take a step further from the guilty parties.

    I do have something of a pet hypothesis that the dot.com crash of late 2000/early 2001 was due in part to Bush being elected: I think tech investors panicked at the idea of Bush getting into office, and that panic precipitated the crash. After all, investing, stocks, and speculation are highly effected by emotion and confidence. It would be interesting to know if there is anything to this idea.


    Where do we go from here?

    On the one hand, we want the Iraqi people to have sovereignty and get our troops out of there as soon as possible. On the other hand, it isn’t very cool that we’re providing support for people setting up torture chambers. It doesn’t seem like we have given the Iraqi people all that great of a government.

    For those who would have us pull all troops from Iraq now: What would this do to Iraq? It seems like the people we’d be leaving in power (who were not democratically elected) have the potential to be very abusive of their people.

    ###

  • Every day it seems like I come across more sites to read. News, analysis, opinion, web logs, etc. It is difficult to decide how much to read. Right now, I have too many to keep up with and a list of 8 or 9 more to review.

    Eventually, I’m going to have to trim it down, but it will be a trick to find the balance of:

    * Varying points in the political spectrum (I want to read various points of views)

    * Accuracy (I want to have places that I know I can trust what they write, but I also want to have a couple that have reasonably reliable cutting edge reports)

    * Prolific (It needs to be regular enough to take the time, but not so much reading that I can’t possibly keep up with it)

    And of course, well written and engaging. I’m not sure how many I’d like to get it down to, but it’d be nice to be able to get through all reading (e-mail and web sites) in under an hour and a half.


    Fact Check has done an analysis of the claims made by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

    According to The Daily Howler, either Dick Cheney was misinformed about the nature of Kerry’s status as the most liberal member of the Senate, or he was lying when he said to someone in Grand Forks:

    “And it’s not based on one vote, or one year, it’s based on 20 years of service in the United States Senate.”

    Intentional or unintentional, it isn’t accurate.

    You probably already know this, but Bush has decided that there should be no provisions for inspections or verification in a new proposed international treaty trying to ban production of weapons-grade uranium and plutonium.

  • Sudan

    It was estimated that 1,000 people a day are dying in the Sudanese camps. I haven’t had a chance to read it yet, but darfurgenocide.org appears to be a source for learning more about what is going on and what to do about it.


    Nifty. Can someone buy this for me?

    There’s a renfest for sale on ebay. A nice one.


    Actors and Musicians in Politics

    I’ve noticed that some people really seem to take offense when big-name artists take a strong political stance. They seem especially annoyed if the artist tries to use their fame to point more attention towards whatever issues they feel are important.

    I don’t really understand the problem. Many of us care about political and social issues and do what we can to get people to hear what we have to say. We often use what assets we have available to help us. If one of your assets is fame, it is something you can use. By using it, an actor or musician can easily hurt their professional interests, but if it is worth it to them to do it, what is the problem?

    Where I really don’t get it is in the case of musicians. Many musicians write and play music inspired by their passion and beliefs. Can you imagine Rage Against the Machine not taking a stance? Art and music is a part of a culture’s soul. Of course it should be vocal about its opinions.

    Of course, I am a bit prejudiced by the fact that my band is fairly political in nature.


    Fact Check is still at it:

    There’s a grassroots Internet campaign trying to smear Teresa Kerry. It’s bogus. (Actually, I think there is something to being held responsible for any stock you own, but the campaign vastly overstates Kerry’s “ownership” of Heinz.)

    Kerry’s approach toward painting a grim picture of our current economy may be based on dubious claims. Unfortunately, I’m a bit too tired at the moment to effectively parse this article, so maybe you can read it and let me know if it makes sense or not.

    Additionally, a group called “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” has been running ads basically calling Kerry a liar. Senator John McCain has condemned these ads and called on President Bush to do the same.

    Among other things, I really respect John McCain for the fact that he seems to hate spin even more than I do. He truly appears to be a man of principle.

    As for the concept that Kerry is the most liberal senator, I have only two words: “I wish”

    It is interesting that the Democrats aren’t trying to refute this claim. Perhaps they hope that they can use it to gain back the support of all the progressives that have gone independent or ditched the Democrats for other parties.

    As for Edwards being the 4th most liberal: In 2003, his voting record did come in at 4th. It sounds impressive until you realize that he was 40th in ’02, 35th in ’01, 19th in ’00, and 31st in ’99.


    Dirty Deeds

    The “Minnesota Politics” web log took issue with State Representative Kahn being charged with stealing her opponent’s campaign literature.

    I would take issue with her NOT being charged. Stealing campaign signs and literature, or trying to win an election by stifling the voice of your opposition is a direct affront to the concept of Democracy and should not be tolerated in an elected official. Especially not one of Kahn’s experience.

  • SUVs violate city ordinances?

    Ok, I lied about skipping politics today, but this is too good not to post. From the Minneapolis city ordinances:

    474.790. Definition. As used in this article, the word “truck” shall include trucks, trailers and semitrailers. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 441.010)

    …474.810. Marking of routes. Truck routes shall be identified by appropriate signs erected and maintained by the city engineer. Further, the city engineer shall post at the city limits, upon all main traffic routes entering the city, signs notifying users of highways that trucks are only permitted to be driven on marked truck routes. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 441.030)

    474.820. Duty to use routes. When any such truck route has been established and identified, any person driving a truck having a gross weight of three (3) tons or more shall drive such truck on such route or routes and none other, except when it is impracticable to do so or where necessary to traverse another street or streets to a destination for the purpose of loading or unloading commodities or for the purpose of towing a disabled or damaged motor vehicle to or from public or private property, and then only by such deviation from the nearest truck route as is reasonably necessary. A truck arriving at the end of any designated truck route may be driven over the most direct course to the nearest truck route which extends in the same general direction. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 414.020)

    474.830. Permits for use of other routes. The city engineer shall have the authority, for cause or upon request, to issue temporary permits for
    trucks to operate over routes not established as truck routes by the city council, or to otherwise deviate from the provisions of the traffic code. Such action by the city engineer shall be subject to review and modification, or cancellation, by the city council. (Code 1960, As Amend., § 414.030)

    474.840. Vehicles excepted. The provisions of this article shall not apply to emergency vehicles of the police department, fire department or
    health department, nor to any public utility vehicles where actually engaged in the performance of emergency duties necessary to be performed by said public departments or public utilities, nor to any vehicle owned by or performing work for the United States of America, the State of Minnesota, the University of Minnesota, or the City of Minneapolis. (Code 1960, As
    Amend., § 441.080)

    I seem to remember not so long ago, SUV manufacturers were advertising large tax breaks for any vehicles over 6000 lbs. Granted, this is not all SUVs, but ya gotta love the irony. Slate gets the credit for this scoop.

  • I’m taking a day off politics today. If you need a fix, I’ve been treading the dangerous ground of the abortion subject on the minnesota-national discussion list lately. Here and here.

    For some reason I thought of an old User Friendly cartoon today:

    Sid. How can you say blogging is all about getting attention? Blogging is about sharing, letting your friends know what’s going on in your life, and being honest with yourself all at the same time!

    I’ll bet you can’t give me one argument that shows blogging is a selfish, anti-social act. Go on. Just one.

    They took the “We” out of “Weblog” didn’t they?

    Uh… They… Uh…

    Reason 4 why I try not to ever refer to it as a “blog”.