Month: May 2003

  • Scorpion ensemble - future battle dressFrom Yahoo!: “This is a 2003 handout photo showing the ‘Scorpion ensemble’ future battle dress for U.S. soldiers, being developed at the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center in Natick, Mass., which is expected to be ready for action in 2011. Today’s soldier when completely outfitted carries as much as 90 to 120 pounds, but the future combat uniform will weigh only 40 to 50 pounds and will include communications, night vision gear, body senors and the latest technology in protective armor. (AP Photo/U.S. Army Soldier Systems Center,Sarah Underhill, handout)”

    Anyone else see a resemblance to desert storm troopers? Cue Imperial March…

    And, as I promised and you probably didn’t want, more puns:

    2. Two boll weevils grew up in South Carolina. One went to Hollywood and became a famous actor. The other stayed behind in the cotton fields and never amounted to much. The second one, naturally, became known as the lesser of two weevils.

    Have no fear, they will grow more painful.

    As a side note related to recent conversations, the Minneapolis Politics list has been discussing people getting cited for unmowed lawns.

    Uh oh.

  • More on our devolution into PC hell – some of the steps that are turning our schools into mind numbing pablum. Hey, we’ve got the corporate end of facism going on as well as the “undefined endless threat” – as long as we’re that close to 1984, why not “newspeak” as well?

  • If you haven’t already read this link from Strange Black Cat’s web log, go do so: Questions and Answers about Foreign Policy (and the US Invasion of Iraq)

    More good news: other great news. Indications are that local gang activity is on the rise, and word on the street is that the Crypts and the Bloods are gearing up for a major turf war to be held in Minneapolis this summer. There are allegedly a lot of new faces – reinforcements from around the country.

    The problem is, while Minneapolis is a relatively small town – only around 300,000 people, it serves as a center for a lot of suburbs, and they tend to come into the city to take care of their criminal needs. Even St. Paulites tend to head to Minneapolis to pick up supplies. This causes good ROI which when combined with light police response in certain areas and poor judicial decisions makes Minneapolis very attractive to gangsta entrepreneurs

    Anyway, it looks like it may be a bloody summer.

    In other news, we’re going to PC heck.

    On the lighter side, the first in a series of puns:

    1. Two vultures board an airplane, each carrying two dead raccoons. The stewardess looks at them and says, “I’m sorry, gentlemen, only one carrion allowed per passenger.”

    Yeah, yeah, we’re starting light.

    It is beautiful outside today – great day for a birthday – hope it’s a happy one.

    Hey, you know, I haven’t heard from CASH909 lately…

  • Interesting things in the news regarding Israel – yesterday, Sharon referred to the occupation of Palestine an occupation. Sounds like no big deal, but the Israeli right has been avoiding the term occupation for a long LONG time (since occupation isn’t really legal and all that), so it shook some things up. Not sure what this portends – could be just a game luring the peace process into a cul-de-sac where it can be beaten senseless once again. Worth watching though.

    Afghanistan is in trouble – not enough peace keepers, warlords on the rise, taliban back on the rise. What exactly was that war for?

    Iraq is getting nastier too – we may not be facing an army any more, but we sure haven’t won the “hearts and minds of the people” yet.

    On the Minnesota front, my biggest complaints with the new conceal-carry law seem to be bugging other people as well – even some in the Republican administration are saying these aspects of the law may need to be reviewed. Neat.

    I don’t know, some times I feel I’m as close to being a Republican as being a Democrat. Not that that’s saying much as I’ve gotten pretty far from being a Democrat – although, that Howard Dean guy sounds pretty cool which probably means his own party will crucify him.

    I don’t know though. If the Republicans got rid of the religous right and the rest of the bigots and swung back to their pre neo-con ideas, who knows, I might almost consider becoming one. Unfortunately, it looks like mainstream conservatism is now neo-conservatism which is pretty much 180 degrees from anything I want. Wikipedia has a nice write up on neo-conservatism at http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_(United_States).

    To get a really interesting tweak, scroll down and check out Jeane Kirkpatrick and the Kirkpatrick doctrine. Seriously, thinking about the implications of what she hand people like her have done to the world makes me hope there is a hell so they can burn in it.

    Granted, she may not be as directly responsible as, say, Kissinger, but considering all the suffering that can be laid at the feet of the post WWII imperialistic conservative leadership makes me physically ill. Seriously, I feel my gorge rise and want to puke. Then I want to hit someone.

    So, no. As long as the Republican party hangs on to these groups and these ideals (which recently, they seem to be embracing tighter than ever), there’s not a chance. And no, Democrats, the opponent of my opponent is NOT necessarily my ally.

  • New Renaissance Faire in Elk River. 32 miles from Minneapolis (23 from Blaine)

    http://www.rosenthorne.com/

    Opens next weekend. Hm.

  • Supporters of IndyMedia (or uncensored media in general), please check out this petition. Annoying that people are signing it with obviously fake names – smells like an attack to me.

    A friend forwarded this for commentary:

    DID GOD CREATE EVIL?

    At a certain college, there was a professor with a reputation for being tough on Christians.

    At the first class every semester, he asked if anyone was a Christian and proceeded to degrade and mock their statement of faith.

    One semester, he asked the question and a young man raised his hand when asked if anyone was a Christian. The professor asked, “Did God make everything, young man?”

    “Yes he did, sir,” the young man replied.

    The professor responded, “If God made everything, then God made evil, and if we can only create from within ourselves, then God is evil.”

    The student didn’t have a response and the professor was happy to have once again proved the Christian faith to be a myth.

    Then another man raised his hand and asked, “May I ask you something, sir?”

    “Yes you may,” responded the professor.

    The young man stood up and said, “Sir, is there such thing as cold?”
    Of course there is, what kind of a question is that? Haven’t you ever been cold?”

    The young man replied, “Actually, sir, cold does not exist. What we consider to be cold, is really only the absence of heat. Absolute zero is when there is absolutely no heat, but cold does not really exist. We have only created that term to describe how we feel when heat is not there.”

    The young man continued, “Sir, is there such thing as dark?”

    Once again, the professor responded “Of course there is.”

    And once again, the student replied “Actually, sir, darkness does not exist. Darkness is really only the absence of light. Darkness is only a term man developed to describe what happens when there is no light present.”

    Finally, the young man asked, “Sir, is there such thing as evil?”

    The professor responded, “Of course. We have rapes, and murders and violence everywhere in the world, those things are evil.” The student replied, “Actually, sir, evil does not exist. Evil is simply the absence of God. Evil is a term man developed to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. It isn’t like truth, or love, which exist as virtues like heat and light. Evil is simply the state where God is not present, like cold without heat or darkness without light.”

    The professor had nothing to say.

    Well, this is pretty likely an urban legend or parable rather than an actual story, but that’s not overly important.

    In general, it does not prove the existence of a creator or god, much less the Abrahamic god, but it does partially refute the common argument against the existence of god that goes:


    If the evil in the world is intended by god he is not good. If it violates his intentions he is not almighty. God can’t be both almighty and good. There are many objections to this, but none that holds since god is ultimately responsible for the existence of evil. Besides, if only god can create he must have created evil. If somebody else (the devil) created evil, how can one know that god, and not Satan created the universe?



    The problem with seeing it as a proof OF god is that god is not the opposite of evil – good is. For those who see god and good as one in the same, fine, but to try and prove one with the other is circular reasoning.

    I do like the idea of evil not being something that exists in and of itself – it is simply the way we define the absense of morality/ethics/good.

    That might mean that a sociopath is not evil because they have an inherent quality of evil but rather because they simply lack any concept or understanding of morality – they exist much as a 2-year old does. They have a desire and they act on it.

    Of course, what is moral, what is ethical, what is good?

    The religious have these defined by their religions. Others trust their “instincts” which may be inherent, defined by family, or by society. Is it absolute or relative? In most places, cold-blooded murder is seen as wrong, but what about killing for self-defense? Executing the guilty? Are those things right, wrong, or is it simply relative to society?

    To take one that people have less polarized opinions on, how about theft? In some cultures, the concepts of “personal propery” were much, much looser – you didn’t own stuff, it was just what you were using at the moment. No property meant no theft, so taking something that someone else was carrying wasn’t immoral – wasn’t evil.

    As another example, some religions see imbibing alcohol as a sin – evil. Others drink it as part of their sacraments – good. Some see it as more or less neutral – not “good”, but not lacking in it either.

    But back to evil as the absense of good…

    There is something about the concept that I think is potentially powerful. I can’t quite put my finger on it, but it has something to do with why good can only exist if we try for it – not caring or not doing results in evil simply because good is not being done. Hell exists when we stop striving for heaven – not in an afterlife, but here, now, on earth, in this life.

    Both light and heat require energy being put into it, similarly, so does good. If the energy stops, it grows cold, dark, and evil. Ragnarok/Gotterdammerung.

    Anyway, this requires more thought. One of the things I’m not sure fits into the idea is sadism – I’m not talking about spanking, but truly finding pleasure in the suffering of others. Is that more than simply the absense of good, or is that somehow a natural primal thing? Hm. Cats…

  • On the Minnesota politics discussion list, the Democrats are still kvetching about the Green party costing them elections. Someone brought up an interesting point:

    The DFL is really upset at Governor Pawlenty’s actions. During that election, the Green Candidate, Ken Pentel, got 3%. Moe (DFL) lost by more than 10% – obviously Pentel didn’t take the election from Moe (not to mention, I personally probably would have ranked the Ballot Pentel -> Penny -> Moe -> Pawlenty).

    Penny got more than 10%, so it is possible that he did make the difference, however, you don’t hear the DFL complaining about the Independence party, just the Green party.

    Hm.

    Anyway, a perennial issue of mine that has come up during this thread is Instant Runoff Voting. It is a bit more complicated than what we’re used to, but avoids many of the problems of our current plurality system. It completely eliminates the concept of a “spoiler” or a “wasted vote” or having to make the choice of voting for the lesser of two evils so the worst candidate doesn’t win. My first exposure to it was when I visited the Republic of Ireland – they use the system there, and the end results seem really good.

    Here are two web sites about it:
    instantrunoff.com
    www.fairvote.org/irv/

    And here’s a flash introduction that shows how it might have worked in the 2000 presidential election:
    www.chrisgates.net/irv/

  • *groan*

    Tired. Got lots of work done, but I’m now very tired. There may be band practice tonight, but I’m [not so] secretly hoping it somehow gets cancelled.

    On the one hand, we’ve got to start auditioning drummers and some practice would be a good idea. On the other hand, we’ve already missed a few weeks, how much could one more hurt…

    I know, I know, that’s always the wrong question to ask.

    Ergh.

    Oh, hey, here’s a cool new pedal vehicle. The guy builds them by hand – he’s a friend of a coworker who’s getting one in tradeout for building the site. Pretty neat.

  • Well, in line with my last post, here’s one of my more vitriolic rants on the Minnesota political listserv.

    The first part is just answering a question asked, so unless you feel like back-reading, skip it.

    The second part, starting with “Ditto. I’m not a Green either.”, explains my party affiliation (or lack thereof)

    And the third part, starting with “The rest of this is something of a rant directed at the DFL. If you don’t want to read it, don’t.”, is obviously the rant.

    I’ve gotten suprisingly good feedback on it so far considering that it includes the words “Fuck Off” aimed at a good portion of the listserv.

    Of course, I’ve only heard responses from Greens and Republicans so far…

  • Best quote I’ve read in a while:

    “Under Republicans, man oppresses man. Under Democrats, it is just the opposite.”

    Probably a takeoff from:

    “In communism, man oppresses man. In capitalism, it’s the other way around.”

    But still good.